Compare AGM M2 vs Lingwin N1
Name | AGM M2 | Lingwin N1 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | ||
CPU | UNISOC 6531D | UNISOC 6531D |
Diagonal size | 2.4 " | 1.77 " |
Resolution | 320x240 | 220x176 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 1 | |
RAM | Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | No | |
ROM | GB | GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 1.3 Mp | 0.3 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | Mp | Mp |
Battery | 1950 mAh | 600 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 2 G | 2 G |
WiFi | No | No |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | ||
Notifications Led | No | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | No |
Operating system (OS) | ||
Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
Weight | 138 g | 85 g |
Dimensions | 139 x 56,8 x 16 mm | 113 x 49 x 13,3 mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all AGM models here
Alternatives to the AGM M2: AGM A10 3/32Gb - Compare AGM A9 4/64Gb - Compare AGM H5 Pro - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Lingwin models here
Alternatives to the Lingwin N1: |
AGM M2 vs Lingwin N1: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the AGM M2’s camera vs Lingwin N1’s camera, see the difference between the 1.3Mp sensor and the 0.3Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | AGM M2 | Lingwin N1 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 1.3 Mp | 0.3 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | No | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | Mp | Mp |
Flash |
AGM M2 vs Lingwin N1: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AGM M2 vs Lingwin N1, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | AGM M2 | Lingwin N1 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 1950 mAh | 600 mAh |
Type | Removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | 4-5 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | No | No |
Wireless charging |
AGM M2 vs Lingwin N1: Antutu benchmark comparison.
AGM M2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 0 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Lingwin N1, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
AGM M2 vs Lingwin N1: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
AGM M2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Lingwin N1 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between AGM M2 and Lingwin N1? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 1.3Mp compared to 0.3Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 320x240 vs 220x176.
- More battery capacity: 1950mAh vs 600mAh (a difference of 1350mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Lingwin N1 (advantages)
- Best weight: 53 grams less (85 vs 138).
Why it is better not to take Lingwin N1 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
AGM M2 related comparisons
- Compare Rover X9 vs AGM M2
- Compare Suppu X6000 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Diamond Z2 vs AGM M2
- Compare Uniwa V708 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Stone V3 Plus vs AGM M2
Lingwin N1 related comparisons
- Compare Nomu S10 Pro vs Lingwin N1
- Compare VKworld New V3 vs Lingwin N1
- Compare Lingwin N2 vs Lingwin N1
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs Lingwin N1