Compare Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb vs Cectdigi T19

Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb vs Cectdigi T19 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb with Cectdigi T19.
Name	Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb	Cectdigi T19

Antutu benchmark	149113
CPU	MediaTek Helio G80	UNISOC 6531D
Diagonal size	6.53 "	2.8 "
Resolution	2340x1080	320x240
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10
RAM	4 Gb	Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	64 GB	GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	Mp
Camera	Four cameras	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	Mp
Battery	5020 mAh	15600 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	2 G
WiFi	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)
Material	Plastic	Metal and plastic
Weight	198 g	154 g
Dimensions	162,3 х 77,2 х 8,9 mm	133 x 59 x 29 mm
Price	127.50€ ($138.57) See Details	Discontinued. View all Cectdigi models here Alternatives to the Cectdigi T19:

Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb vs Cectdigi T19: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Redmi 9’s camera vs Cectdigi T19’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb	Cectdigi T19
Rear camera	13 Mp	Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	Mp
Flash	No

Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb vs Cectdigi T19: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Redmi 9 vs Cectdigi T19, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb	Cectdigi T19
Battery	5020 mAh	15600 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	8-9 days
Battery Life	3-4 days	20-30 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours	14-15 hours
Talk time	30 hours	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging	No

Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb vs Cectdigi T19: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 149113 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cectdigi T19, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb

6.53 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Helio G80 / 4Gb / 64GB / 13Mp / 5020mAh

127.50€

$138.57

149113

Cectdigi T19

2.8" (320x240) Glass / 6531D / 15600mAh

0.00€

$0.00

Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb vs Cectdigi T19: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 387 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cectdigi T19 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1348 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb

6.53 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Helio G80 / 4Gb / 64GB / 13Mp / 5020mAh

127.50€

$138.57

387 / 1348

Cectdigi T19

2.8" (320x240) Glass / 6531D / 15600mAh

0.00€

$0.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb and Cectdigi T19? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb (advantages)

Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 320x240.
Have infrared blaster supports.
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cectdigi T19 (advantages)

Best weight: 44 grams less (154 vs 198).
More battery capacity: 15600mAh vs 5020mAh (a difference of 10580mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cectdigi T19 (disadvantages)

Does not have infrared blaster supports.
Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The advantages of both models

Have fast charging supports.

Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb related comparisons

Cectdigi T19 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 172

Frequent comparisons