Compare Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot Cheetah 2 3/32Gb
| Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | Cubot Cheetah 2 3/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 37524 | 36673 |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6753 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 5 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 3 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3L8 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 2800 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | ||
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 6.0 | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Metal and plastic | Metal |
| Weight | 140 g | 188 g |
| Dimensions | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm | 153.6 x 75 x 8.5 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot Cheetah 2 3/32Gb: Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro - Compare Cubot Note 20 - Compare Cubot X30 8/128Gb - Compare |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot Cheetah 2 3/32Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor’s camera vs Cubot Cheetah 2’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp Samsung S5K3L8 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | Cubot Cheetah 2 3/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3L8 | |
| Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot Cheetah 2 3/32Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor vs Cubot Cheetah 2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | Cubot Cheetah 2 3/32Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2800 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 4-5 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 20 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot Cheetah 2 3/32Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37524 score points which is 2.32% faster than the Cubot Cheetah 2 3/32Gb, which got 36673. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot Cheetah 2 3/32Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot Cheetah 2 3/32Gb which got 116, it is 0.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 604 vs 659 (-8.35% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vernee Thor 3/16Gb and Cubot Cheetah 2 3/32Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 2.32% faster in the Antutu test (851 score difference).
- Best weight: 48 grams less (140 vs 188).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Cheetah 2 3/32Gb (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp Sony IMX219 vs 5Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 200mAh).
Why it is better not to take Cubot Cheetah 2 3/32Gb (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro
Cubot Cheetah 2 3/32Gb related comparisons
- Compare Cubot Cheetah 2 vs Doogee X5 Max Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 3X vs Cubot Cheetah 2
- Compare Cubot Cheetah 2 vs Xiaomi Redmi 6
- Compare Cubot Cheetah 2 vs Meizu M5 Note
- Compare Cubot Cheetah 2 vs Cubot Dinosaur