Compare Cubot Echo 2/16Gb vs Cubot S200
Name | Cubot Echo 2/16Gb | Cubot S200 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 21205 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6580 | MediaTek MT6582 |
Diagonal size | 5 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 2 Gb | 1 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
Battery | 3000 mAh | 3300 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 3 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
Notifications Led | Yes | |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 6.0 | |
Material | Plastic | |
Weight | 169 g | g |
Dimensions | 143.0 x 72.0 x 11.4 mm | mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot Echo 2/16Gb: Cubot Note 8 - Compare Cubot Pocket - Compare Cubot King Kong Mini 2 - Compare |
45.09€ ($49.00) See Details |
Cubot Echo 2/16Gb vs Cubot S200 : Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot Echo’s camera vs Cubot S200 ’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Cubot Echo 2/16Gb | Cubot S200 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
Flash | No |
Cubot Echo 2/16Gb vs Cubot S200 : battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Echo vs Cubot S200 , compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Cubot Echo 2/16Gb | Cubot S200 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 3000 mAh | 3300 mAh |
Type | Removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | |
Talk time | 25 hours | |
Fast charging | No | |
Wireless charging |
Cubot Echo 2/16Gb vs Cubot S200 : Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot Echo 2/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21205 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S200 , which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot Echo 2/16Gb vs Cubot S200 : Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot Echo 2/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 67 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S200 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 228 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot Echo 2/16Gb and Cubot S200 ? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Echo 2/16Gb (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Cubot Echo 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S200 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- More battery capacity: 3300mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 300mAh).
Why it is better not to take Cubot S200 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Cubot Echo 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Leagoo M5 vs Cubot Echo
- Compare Cubot Echo vs OUKITEL C5 Pro
- Compare Blackview A8 Max vs Cubot Echo
- Compare Cubot Echo vs Ulefone U008 Pro
- Compare Cubot Echo vs Cubot Manito
Cubot S200 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Micromax Selfie 3
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs OUKITEL K6000 Pro