Compare Cubot King Kong CS vs HT F801C
Name | Cubot King Kong CS | HT F801C |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 21244 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6580 | |
Diagonal size | 5 " | " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | |
RAM | 2 Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | No | |
ROM | 16 GB | GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb | |
Rear camera | 8 Mp | Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 4400 mAh | mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 3 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
Notifications Led | Yes | |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | |
Material | Plastic | |
Weight | 220 g | g |
Dimensions | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm | mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong CS: Cubot X30 8/256Gb - Compare Cubot Note 30 - Compare Cubot X30 8/128Gb - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all HT models here
Alternatives to the HT F801C: |
Cubot King Kong CS vs HT F801C: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong CS’s camera vs HT F801C’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Cubot King Kong CS | HT F801C |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 8 Mp | Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Flash | No |
Cubot King Kong CS vs HT F801C: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong CS vs HT F801C, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Cubot King Kong CS | HT F801C |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4400 mAh | mAh |
Type | Non-removable | |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | |
Talk time | 30 hours | |
Fast charging | No | |
Wireless charging | No |
Cubot King Kong CS vs HT F801C: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong CS in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 100.00% faster than the HT F801C, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot King Kong CS vs HT F801C: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong CS in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 60 points score in "Single-core" of against the HT F801C which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 249 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot King Kong CS and HT F801C? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong CS (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong CS (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the HT F801C (advantages)
Why it is better not to take HT F801C (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Cubot King Kong CS related comparisons
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Ulefone Armor X6 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Zopo zp700 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Doogee DG800 (Valencia) vs Cubot King Kong CS
HT F801C related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs ZTE Blade A530
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs UMIDIGI A5 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs Blackview BV5500 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A8S
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs Doogee N20