Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S208
| Name | Cubot Pocket | Cubot S208 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 137655 | |
| CPU | UNISOC Tiger T310 | |
| Diagonal size | 4 " | " |
| Resolution | 1080x540 | |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | |
| RAM | 4 Gb | Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | |
| ROM | 64 GB | GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | |
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | G |
| Sim cards | ||
| WiFi | Yes | |
| Bluetooth | Yes | |
| NFC | Yes | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
| Notifications Led | No | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | |
| Material | Plastic | |
| Weight | 149 g | g |
| Dimensions | 119 x 58 x 12.5 mm | mm |
| Price | 80.35€ ($87.24) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot S208: Cubot X30 8/128Gb - Compare Cubot X20 Pro - Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 3 - Compare |
Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S208: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot Pocket’s camera vs Cubot S208’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Cubot Pocket | Cubot S208 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
| Flash | No |
Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S208: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S208, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Cubot Pocket | Cubot S208 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3000 mAh | mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | |
| Talk time | 25 hours | |
| Fast charging | No | |
| Wireless charging | No |
Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S208: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot Pocket in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 137655 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S208, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S208: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot Pocket in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 295 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S208 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1012 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot Pocket and Cubot S208? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket (advantages)
- NFC supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S208 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Cubot S208 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Cubot Pocket related comparisons
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot King Kong Mini 2
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro
- Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 3 vs Cubot Pocket
- Compare Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot Pocket
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Soyes XS12
Cubot S208 related comparisons
- Compare Doogee BL7000 vs Doogee BL12000
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X vs Doogee BL12000
- Compare Doogee S60 vs Doogee BL12000
- Compare Doogee BL12000 vs OUKITEL K7 Power
- Compare Doogee BL12000 vs Apple iPhone 7 Ref