Compare Xiaomi Redmi 8A vs OUKITEL C17
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi 8A | OUKITEL C17 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 88112 | 82177 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 | MediaTek Helio P23 |
| Diagonal size | 6.22 " | 6.35 " |
| Resolution | 1520x720 | 1560x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 2 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX486 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3900 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | No | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Weight | 190 g | 193 g |
| Dimensions | 156.3×75.4×9.4 mm | 158 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm |
| Price | 91.84€ ($99.71) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C17: OUKITEL C18 Pro - Compare OUKITEL C19 Pro - Compare OUKITEL C15 Pro + - Compare |
Xiaomi Redmi 8A vs OUKITEL C17: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Redmi 8A’s camera vs OUKITEL C17’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Sony IMX486 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi 8A | OUKITEL C17 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX486 | |
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Redmi 8A vs OUKITEL C17: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Redmi 8A vs OUKITEL C17, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi 8A | OUKITEL C17 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3900 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi Redmi 8A vs OUKITEL C17: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi 8A in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 88112 score points which is 7.22% faster than the OUKITEL C17, which got 82177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Redmi 8A vs OUKITEL C17: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi 8A in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 147 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C17 which got 156, it is -5.77% faster. In "Multi-core" score 520 vs 875 (-40.57% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Redmi 8A and OUKITEL C17? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi 8A (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 7.22% faster in the Antutu test (5935 score difference).
- Best weight: 3 grams less (190 vs 193).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3900mAh (a difference of 1100mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi 8A (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C17 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 12Mp Sony IMX486
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1560x720 vs 1520x720.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C17 (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Xiaomi Redmi 8A related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A
- Compare UMIDIGI A5 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 8A vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global
- Compare GOME U7 vs Xiaomi Redmi 8A
OUKITEL C17 related comparisons
- Compare UMIDIGI A5 Pro vs OUKITEL C17
- Compare OUKITEL C17 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global
- Compare Ulefone Power 3s vs OUKITEL C17
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs OUKITEL C17
- Compare OUKITEL C17 vs Oppo Realme C2