Compare Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs UMI Rome
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | UMI Rome |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 37524 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6753 | MediaTek MT6753 |
Diagonal size | 5 " | 5.5 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 3 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 2 Mp |
Battery | 2800 mAh | 2500 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
Notifications Led | Yes | |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 6.0 | Android 5.1 |
Material | Metal and plastic | |
Weight | 140 g | 177 g |
Dimensions | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm | 155.8 x 77 x 7.9 mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Discontinued.
View all UMI models here
Alternatives to the UMI Rome: |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs UMI Rome: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor’s camera vs UMI Rome’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | UMI Rome |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 2 Mp |
Flash | No |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs UMI Rome: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor vs UMI Rome, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | UMI Rome |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2800 mAh | 2500 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | |
Talk time | 20 hours | |
Fast charging | Yes | |
Wireless charging |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs UMI Rome: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37524 score points which is 100.00% faster than the UMI Rome, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs UMI Rome: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the UMI Rome which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 604 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vernee Thor 3/16Gb and UMI Rome? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 37 grams less (140 vs 177).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 2Mp .
- More battery capacity: 2800mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 300mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the UMI Rome (advantages)
Why it is better not to take UMI Rome (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro
UMI Rome related comparisons
- Compare Meizu M5 Note vs Zopo Flash X Plus
- Compare Meizu M5S vs UMI Rome
- Compare Zopo Flash X Plus vs Billion Capture Plus
- Compare Feed Me Intel i7 256SSD vs Xiaomi Redmibook 14 Ryzen 7
- Compare Blackview BV7000 vs Zopo Flash X Plus