0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare UMIDIGI A15C vs Cubot P80

UMIDIGI A15C vs Cubot P80 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of UMIDIGI A15C with Cubot P80.

Name UMIDIGI A15C Cubot P80
UMIDIGI A15C Cubot P80
Antutu benchmark 221783 199835
CPU UNISOC Tiger T606 MediaTek Helio P60
Diagonal size 6.7 " 6.58 "
Resolution 1650x720 2408x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 10
RAM 8 Gb 8 Gb
Bezel-less Yes Yes
ROM 128 GB 256 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 48 Mp 48 Mp
Camera Triple Camera Triple Camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 24 Mp
Battery 5000 mAh 5200 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 13 Android 13
Material Plastic Plastic
Weight 195 g g
Dimensions 167.6 x 75.3 x 8.6 mm mm
  Price 136.31€ ($148.00) See Details Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot P80:
Cubot King Kong Mini 2 - Compare
Cubot P50 - Compare
Cubot S200 - Compare

UMIDIGI A15C vs Cubot P80: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the UMIDIGI A15C’s camera vs Cubot P80’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 48Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name UMIDIGI A15C Cubot P80
Rear camera 48 Mp 48 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 24 Mp
Flash No No

UMIDIGI A15C vs Cubot P80: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the UMIDIGI A15C vs Cubot P80, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name UMIDIGI A15C Cubot P80
Battery 5000 mAh 5200 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours 10-12 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging No No

UMIDIGI A15C vs Cubot P80: Antutu benchmark comparison. UMIDIGI A15C vs Cubot P80: Antutu benchmark comparison.

UMIDIGI A15C in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 221783 score points which is 10.98% faster than the Cubot P80, which got 199835. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

136.31€
$148.00
 
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

UMIDIGI A15C vs Cubot P80: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

UMIDIGI A15C in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 321 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot P80 which got 328, it is -2.13% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1276 vs 1485 (-14.07% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

136.31€
$148.00
 
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

What is the difference between UMIDIGI A15C and Cubot P80? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the UMIDIGI A15C (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 10.98% faster in the Antutu test (21948 score difference).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take UMIDIGI A15C (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot P80 (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 24Mp vs 8Mp .
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 1650x720.
  • More battery capacity: 5200mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 200mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot P80 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

  • NFC supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

UMIDIGI A15C related comparisons

Cubot P80 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 2
Frequent comparisons