Compare Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 148199 | 31000 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P70 | MediaTek MT6737 |
| Diagonal size | 5.7 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | Sony IMX219 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 364 g | 155 g |
| Dimensions | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm | 155.8 x 77.8 x 9.35 mm |
| Price | 264.70€ ($287.69) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb: Ulefone Armor 8 Pro 8/128Gb - Compare Ulefone Power Armor 14 - Compare Ulefone Armor X7 Pro - Compare |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 3WT’s camera vs Ulefone Tiger’s camera, see the difference between the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor and the 8Mp Sony IMX219 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | Sony IMX219 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Ulefone Tiger, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 7-8 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 148199 score points which is 378.06% faster than the Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb, which got 31000. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 320 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1475 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 3WT and Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3WT (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 378.06% faster in the Antutu test (117199 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 21Mp Sony IMX230 compared to 8Mp Sony IMX219
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp Samsung S5K5E2.
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 4200mAh (a difference of 6100mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3WT (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 209 grams less (155 vs 364).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Ulefone Armor 3WT related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Tiger vs OUKITEL U20 Plus
- Compare Ulefone Tiger vs Doogee X5 Max Pro
- Compare HomTom HT20 vs Ulefone Tiger
- Compare Ulefone Tiger vs UMIDIGI Z1 Pro
- Compare Ulefone Tiger vs Vernee Thor