Compare BLUBOO S1 vs AGM M2

BLUBOO S1 vs AGM M2 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of BLUBOO S1 with AGM M2.
Name	BLUBOO S1	AGM M2

Antutu benchmark	73387
CPU	MediaTek MT6757 Pro / Helio P25	UNISOC 6531D
Diagonal size	5.5 "	2.4 "
Resolution	1920x1080	320x240
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10
RAM	4 Gb	Gb
Bezel-less	Yes
ROM	64 GB	GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	16 Mp	1.3 Mp
Camera	Dual Camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	3 Mp	Mp
Battery	3500 mAh	1950 mAh
Wireless charging
Network	4 G	2 G
WiFi	Yes	No
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 7.0
Material	Metal frame and plastic case	Plastics and rubber
Weight	130 g	138 g
Dimensions	146 x 69 x 8 mm	139 x 56,8 x 16 mm
Price	164.97€ ($178.59) See Details	Discontinued. View all AGM models here Alternatives to the AGM M2: AGM H5 Pro - Compare AGM M7 - Compare AGM Glory G1 - Compare

BLUBOO S1 vs AGM M2: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the BLUBOO S1’s camera vs AGM M2’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 1.3Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	BLUBOO S1	AGM M2
Rear camera	16 Mp	1.3 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash	No
Front (selfie) camera	3 Mp	Mp
Flash	No

BLUBOO S1 vs AGM M2: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the BLUBOO S1 vs AGM M2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	BLUBOO S1	AGM M2
Battery	3500 mAh	1950 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	6-7 hours	7-8 hours
Talk time	25 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging

BLUBOO S1 vs AGM M2: Antutu benchmark comparison.

BLUBOO S1 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 73387 score points which is 100.00% faster than the AGM M2, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

BLUBOO S1

5.5" (1920x1080) Gorilla glass / MT6757 Pro / Helio P25 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3500mAh

164.97€

$178.59

73387

AGM M2

2.4 inches (320x240) Glass / 6531D / 1.3Mp / 1950mAh

0.00€

$0.00

BLUBOO S1 vs AGM M2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

BLUBOO S1 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 185 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM M2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 781 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

BLUBOO S1

5.5" (1920x1080) Gorilla glass / MT6757 Pro / Helio P25 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3500mAh

164.97€

$178.59

185 / 781

AGM M2

2.4 inches (320x240) Glass / 6531D / 1.3Mp / 1950mAh

0.00€

$0.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between BLUBOO S1 and AGM M2? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the BLUBOO S1 (advantages)

Best weight: 8 grams less (130 vs 138).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 1.3Mp
Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 320x240.
More battery capacity: 3500mAh vs 1950mAh (a difference of 1550mAh).
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take BLUBOO S1 (disadvantages)

Does not have water resistant supports.

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)

Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)

Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

BLUBOO S1 related comparisons

AGM M2 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.64/5 of 1041

Frequent comparisons