Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Blackview BV9900
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Blackview BV9900 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 326155 | 172911 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | MediaTek Helio P90 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 5.84 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX582 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4380 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 187 g | 264 g |
| Dimensions | 159,9 x 75,1 x 8,4 mm | 156.5 x 78.3 x 14.2 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Samsung Galaxy A8S - Compare Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro - Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G - Compare |
397.94€ ($433.45) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Blackview BV9900: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G’s camera vs Blackview BV9900’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Blackview BV9900 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX582 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Blackview BV9900: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Blackview BV9900, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Blackview BV9900 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4380 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Blackview BV9900: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 326155 score points which is 88.63% faster than the Blackview BV9900, which got 172911. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Blackview BV9900: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 613 points score in "Single-core" of against the Blackview BV9900 which got 395, it is 55.19% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1916 vs 1432 (33.80% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Blackview BV9900? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 88.63% faster in the Antutu test (153244 score difference).
- Best weight: 77 grams less (187 vs 264).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 48Mp Sony IMX582
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 16Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2340x1080.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4380mAh (a difference of 620mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV9900 (advantages)
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BV9900 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A71 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Blackview BV9900 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Blackview BV9900
- Compare Doogee S95 Pro vs Blackview BV9900
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Blackview BV9900
- Compare Blackview BV9600 Pro (Helio P60) vs Blackview BV9900
- Compare Blackview BV9900 vs Blackview BV9900 Pro