0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Meizu M6 2/16Gb vs Coolpad F1 2/8Gb

Meizu M6 2/16Gb vs Coolpad F1 2/8Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Meizu M6 2/16Gb with Coolpad F1 2/8Gb.

Name Meizu M6 2/16Gb Coolpad F1 2/8Gb
Meizu M6 2/16Gb Coolpad F1 2/8Gb
Antutu benchmark 39669
CPU MediaTek MT6750
Diagonal size 5.2 " "
Resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 2 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 16 GB 8 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp Mp
Battery 3070 mAh 2500 mAh
Wireless charging
Network 4 G G
Sim cards
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes
NFC No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 7.0
Material Plastic
Weight 143 g g
Dimensions 148,2 x 72,8 x 8,3 mm mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Meizu models here
Alternatives to the Meizu M6 2/16Gb:
Meizu 18x 12/256GB - Compare
Meizu 18x 8/256GB - Compare
Meizu 18s 8/256GB - Compare
Discontinued. View all Coolpad models here
Alternatives to the Coolpad F1 2/8Gb:
Coolpad Cool 20 4/128GB - Compare
Coolpad Cool 20 6/128GB - Compare

Meizu M6 2/16Gb vs Coolpad F1 2/8Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Meizu M6’s camera vs Coolpad F1’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Meizu M6 2/16Gb Coolpad F1 2/8Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp Mp
Flash No

Meizu M6 2/16Gb vs Coolpad F1 2/8Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Meizu M6 vs Coolpad F1, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Meizu M6 2/16Gb Coolpad F1 2/8Gb
Battery 3070 mAh 2500 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 6-7 hours
Talk time 25 hours
Fast charging No
Wireless charging

Meizu M6 2/16Gb vs Coolpad F1 2/8Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison. Meizu M6 2/16Gb vs Coolpad F1 2/8Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Meizu M6 2/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 39669 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Coolpad F1 2/8Gb, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Meizu M6 2/16Gb
5.2" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6750 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3070mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
153.57€
$167.27
 

Meizu M6 2/16Gb vs Coolpad F1 2/8Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Meizu M6 2/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 122 points score in "Single-core" of against the Coolpad F1 2/8Gb which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 505 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Meizu M6 2/16Gb
5.2" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6750 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3070mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
153.57€
$167.27
 

What is the difference between Meizu M6 2/16Gb and Coolpad F1 2/8Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Meizu M6 2/16Gb (advantages)

  • More battery capacity: 3070mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 570mAh).
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Meizu M6 2/16Gb (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Coolpad F1 2/8Gb (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Coolpad F1 2/8Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The advantages of both models

Meizu M6 2/16Gb related comparisons

Coolpad F1 2/8Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.58/5 of 48
Frequent comparisons