Compare Cubot King Kong vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS
Name | Cubot King Kong | Xiaomi Redmi 3SS |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 21244 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6580 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 |
Diagonal size | 5 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 2 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb | |
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 4400 mAh | 4000 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 3 G | G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
Notifications Led | Yes | |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 7.0 | |
Material | Plastic | |
Weight | 220 g | 143 g |
Dimensions | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm | 139,3 x 69,6 x 8,5 mm |
Price | 97.72€ ($106.44) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: Xiaomi Black Shark 4S 12/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s 6/128Gb - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Global 6/64GB - Compare |
Cubot King Kong vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong’s camera vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Cubot King Kong | Xiaomi Redmi 3SS |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No |
Cubot King Kong vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Cubot King Kong | Xiaomi Redmi 3SS |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4400 mAh | 4000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | |
Talk time | 30 hours | |
Fast charging | No | |
Wireless charging |
Cubot King Kong vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Xiaomi Redmi 3SS, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot King Kong vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 72 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Redmi 3SS which got 114, it is -36.84% faster. In "Multi-core" score 258 vs 532 (-51.50% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot King Kong and Xiaomi Redmi 3SS? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 400mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi 3SS (advantages)
- Best weight: 77 grams less (143 vs 220).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi 3SS (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Cubot King Kong related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Nomu S10 vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Blackview R6 vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Doogee S30
- Compare ZOJI Z7 vs Cubot King Kong
Xiaomi Redmi 3SS related comparisons
- Compare TECLAST 98 vs VOYO Q101
- Compare TECLAST 98 vs TECLAST T10
- Compare TECLAST X80 Pro vs TECLAST 98
- Compare TECLAST 98 vs TECLAST A10S
- Compare TECLAST 98 vs CUBE iPlay 10