Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot X9
| Name | Cubot KingKong AX | Cubot X9 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 359821 | 29637 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek MT6592M |
| Diagonal size | 6.58 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | Sony IMX135 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 2200 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 4.4 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal frame and plastic case |
| Weight | 296 g | 124 g |
| Dimensions | 172 x 80.9 x 12.7 mm | 143.5 x 72.5 x 7.3 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot KingKong AX: Cubot KingKong Power - Compare Cubot P30 - Compare Cubot Max 3 - Compare |
63.46€ ($69.00) See Details |
Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot X9: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot KingKong AX’s camera vs Cubot X9’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung HM2 sensor and the 13Mp Sony IMX135 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Cubot KingKong AX | Cubot X9 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | Sony IMX135 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot X9: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot X9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Cubot KingKong AX | Cubot X9 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 2200 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 4-5 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 4-5 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No |
Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot X9: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot KingKong AX in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 359821 score points which is 1114.09% faster than the Cubot X9, which got 29637. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot X9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot KingKong AX in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 589 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot X9 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1922 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot KingKong AX and Cubot X9? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot KingKong AX (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1114.09% faster in the Antutu test (330184 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM2 compared to 13Mp Sony IMX135
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 5100mAh vs 2200mAh (a difference of 2900mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot KingKong AX (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X9 (advantages)
- Best weight: 172 grams less (124 vs 296).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot X9 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Cubot KingKong AX related comparisons
- Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot King Kong 9
- Compare Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot KingKong AX
- Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot KingKong Mini 3
- Compare Honor X9b vs Cubot KingKong AX
Cubot X9 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Lenovo K5 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Cubot Quest
- Compare Xiaomi Mi5S Plus vs Xiaomi Mi 8 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite vs Lenovo K5 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs Lenovo K5 Pro