Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy M22 4/128GB
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Samsung Galaxy M22 4/128GB |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 313177 | 212166 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G95 | MediaTek Helio G80 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.4 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 350 g | 186 g |
| Dimensions | 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm | 159,9 x 74 x 8,4 mm |
| Price | 186.88€ ($203.20) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy M22 4/128GB: Samsung Galaxy A60 6/64Gb - Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 - Compare Samsung Galaxy S23 8/256GB - Compare |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy M22 4/128GB: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 R2022’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy M22’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 48Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Samsung Galaxy M22 4/128GB |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Four LEDs | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy M22 4/128GB: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy M22, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Samsung Galaxy M22 4/128GB |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy M22 4/128GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 R2022 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 313177 score points which is 47.61% faster than the Samsung Galaxy M22 4/128GB, which got 212166. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy M22 4/128GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 R2022 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 427 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy M22 4/128GB which got 350, it is 22.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1550 vs 1347 (15.07% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between IIIF150 R2022 and Samsung Galaxy M22 4/128GB? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 47.61% faster in the Antutu test (101011 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 48Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 13Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1600x720.
- More battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 3300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M22 4/128GB (advantages)
- Best weight: 164 grams less (186 vs 350).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M22 4/128GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons
- Compare F150 R2022 vs OUKITEL WP17
- Compare F150 R2022 vs Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Compare F150 R2022 vs F150 H2022
- Compare F150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT
- Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 Air1 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M22 4/128GB related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M22 vs Samsung Galaxy M32
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M22 vs Samsung Galaxy M21
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M22
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M22
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M22 vs Samsung Galaxy A21s