Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Motorola Moto G Fast
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | Motorola Moto G Fast |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 290582 | 158799 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 720 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 6.4 " |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 1560x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Weight | 205 g | 189 g |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm | 161,9 x 75,7 x 9 mm |
| Price | 235.00€ ($255.52) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Motorola models here
Alternatives to the Motorola Moto G Fast: Motorola One Zoom - Compare Motorola Moto G13 - Compare Motorola Moto E6S - Compare |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Motorola Moto G Fast: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G’s camera vs Motorola Moto G Fast’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | Motorola Moto G Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Motorola Moto G Fast: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Motorola Moto G Fast, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | Motorola Moto G Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Motorola Moto G Fast: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 290582 score points which is 82.99% faster than the Motorola Moto G Fast, which got 158799. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Motorola Moto G Fast: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 505 points score in "Single-core" of against the Motorola Moto G Fast which got 313, it is 61.34% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1659 vs 1368 (21.27% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A32 5G and Motorola Moto G Fast? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 82.99% faster in the Antutu test (131783 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 16Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 8Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1560x720.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1000mAh).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Motorola Moto G Fast (advantages)
- Best weight: 16 grams less (189 vs 205).
Why it is better not to take Motorola Moto G Fast (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A23 4G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Motorola Moto G Fast related comparisons
- Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
- Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Motorola Moto G10 Play
- Compare UMIDIGI One Max vs Motorola Moto G Fast
- Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Huawei Mate 40e