Compare Nokia 2.1 vs Nokia C3
Name | Nokia 2.1 | Nokia C3 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 31799 | 28177 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 | UNISOC SC9832E |
Diagonal size | 5.5 " | 5.99 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 1520x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 1 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 4000 mAh | 3030 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 8.1 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |
Weight | 155 g | 185 g |
Dimensions | 153,7 x 77,7 x 9.4 mm | 159.9 x 77 x 8.7 mm |
Price | 92.37€ ($99.99) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Nokia models here
Alternatives to the Nokia C3: Nokia 5.3 - Compare Nokia 2.2 - Compare Nokia 3.2 2/16GB - Compare |
Nokia 2.1 vs Nokia C3: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Nokia 2.1’s camera vs Nokia C3’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Nokia 2.1 | Nokia C3 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Nokia 2.1 vs Nokia C3: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 2.1 vs Nokia C3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Nokia 2.1 | Nokia C3 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4000 mAh | 3030 mAh |
Type | Removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 2.5 hours | 1,5-2 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 6-7 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | No | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Nokia 2.1 vs Nokia C3: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Nokia 2.1 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 31799 score points which is 12.85% faster than the Nokia C3, which got 28177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Nokia 2.1 vs Nokia C3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Nokia 2.1 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia C3 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Nokia 2.1 and Nokia C3? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 2.1 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 12.85% faster in the Antutu test (3622 score difference).
- Best weight: 30 grams less (155 vs 185).
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 3030mAh (a difference of 970mAh).
Why it is better not to take Nokia 2.1 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia C3 (advantages)
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Nokia C3 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Nokia 2.1 related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 2.1 vs Nokia C1
- Compare Nokia 8 vs Nokia 2.1
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia 2.1
- Compare Nokia 8.1 vs Nokia 2.1
- Compare Nokia 6.1 vs Nokia 2.1
Nokia C3 related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 5.1 vs Nokia C3
- Compare Nokia 2.4 vs Nokia C3
- Compare Nokia 5.4 vs Nokia C3
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Nokia C3
- Compare Nokia 2.3 vs Nokia C3