Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb
Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 512775 | 85188 |
CPU | Samsung Exynos 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 |
Diagonal size | 6.2 " | 5.71 " |
Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1520x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 12 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | Samsung S5K2LD | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 8 Mp |
Battery | 4000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | Yes |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic frame and glass case |
Weight | 163 g | 161 g |
Dimensions | 151,7 x 69,1 x 7,9 mm | 149×71.3×8.4 mm |
Price | 434.39€ ($470.25) See Details | 84.84€ ($91.84) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy S20’s camera vs Nokia 4.2’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Samsung S5K2LD sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 12 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung S5K2LD | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 8 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Nokia 4.2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 6-7 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S20 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 512775 score points which is 501.93% faster than the Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb, which got 85188. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S20 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 580 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb which got 175, it is 231.43% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2616 vs 798 (227.82% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy S20 and Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy S20 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 501.93% faster in the Antutu test (427587 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3200x1440 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 1000mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy S20 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 2 grams less (161 vs 163).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 12Mp Samsung S5K2LD
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy S20 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy S20
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S23 vs Samsung Galaxy S20
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A54 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S20
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Samsung Galaxy A01
- Compare MiGueR Note 10 vs Nokia 4.2
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs LG Q6
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Oppo A15
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip