Compare OUKITEL C35 vs Cubot P60
Name | OUKITEL C35 | Cubot P60 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 231352 | 107944 |
CPU | UNISOC Tiger T616 | MediaTek Helio P35 |
Diagonal size | 6.56 " | 6.51 " |
Resolution | 1600x720 | 1600x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
RAM | 12 Gb | 6 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 50 Mp | 20 Mp |
Camera | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | Samsung S5KJN1 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
Battery | 5150 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 12 |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |
Weight | 199 g | g |
Dimensions | 163.75 x 75.4 x 9.18 mm | mm |
Price | 136.99€ ($149.21) See Details | 75.68€ ($82.43) See Details |
OUKITEL C35 vs Cubot P60: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL C35’s camera vs Cubot P60’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 sensor and the 20Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | OUKITEL C35 | Cubot P60 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 50 Mp | 20 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung S5KJN1 | |
Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
OUKITEL C35 vs Cubot P60: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL C35 vs Cubot P60, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | OUKITEL C35 | Cubot P60 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 5150 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
OUKITEL C35 vs Cubot P60: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL C35 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 231352 score points which is 114.33% faster than the Cubot P60, which got 107944. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL C35 vs Cubot P60: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL C35 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 377 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot P60 which got 158, it is 138.61% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1368 vs 889 (53.88% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL C35 and Cubot P60? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C35 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 114.33% faster in the Antutu test (123408 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 compared to 20Mp
- NFC supports.
- More battery capacity: 5150mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 150mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C35 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot P60 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Cubot P60 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
OUKITEL C35 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL C36
- Compare OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL C33
- Compare UMIDIGI A15 vs OUKITEL C35
- Compare OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL C32
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A55 5G vs OUKITEL C35
Cubot P60 related comparisons
- Compare Cubot P60 vs Cubot P50
- Compare Cubot Note 30 vs Cubot P60
- Compare Cubot X30 vs Cubot P60
- Compare Cubot P60 vs Cubot P40
- Compare OUKITEL C32 vs Cubot P60