Compare OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL K12
Name | OUKITEL C35 | OUKITEL K12 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 231352 | |
CPU | UNISOC Tiger T616 | |
Diagonal size | 6.56 " | " |
Resolution | 1600x720 | |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | |
RAM | 12 Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | |
ROM | 256 GB | GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | |
Rear camera | 50 Mp | Mp |
Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | Samsung S5KJN1 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 5150 mAh | mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 4 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | Yes | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
Notifications Led | No | |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | |
Material | Plastic | |
Weight | 199 g | g |
Dimensions | 163.75 x 75.4 x 9.18 mm | mm |
Price | 137.23€ ($149.21) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL K12: OUKITEL C33 - Compare OUKITEL WP5 4/32Gb - Compare OUKITEL WP18 Pro - Compare |
OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL K12: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL C35’s camera vs OUKITEL K12’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | OUKITEL C35 | OUKITEL K12 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 50 Mp | Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung S5KJN1 | |
Flash | LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | Mp |
Flash | No |
OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL K12: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL K12, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | OUKITEL C35 | OUKITEL K12 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 5150 mAh | mAh |
Type | Non-removable | |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | |
Talk time | 30 hours | |
Fast charging | Yes | |
Wireless charging | No |
OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL K12: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL C35 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 231352 score points which is 100.00% faster than the OUKITEL K12, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL K12: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL C35 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 377 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL K12 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1368 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL C35 and OUKITEL K12? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C35 (advantages)
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C35 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL K12 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL K12 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
OUKITEL C35 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL C36
- Compare OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL C33
- Compare UMIDIGI A15 vs OUKITEL C35
- Compare OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL C32
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A55 5G vs OUKITEL C35
OUKITEL K12 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Global
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Xiaomi Mi 8