Compare OUKITEL K16 vs OUKITEL U2
Name | OUKITEL K16 | OUKITEL U2 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 202399 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT8788 | MediaTek MT6735 |
Diagonal size | 3.5 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 960x540 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 1 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 128 GB | 8 GB |
External memory | No | |
Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 3050 mAh | 2050 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 4 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | Yes | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
Notifications Led | No | |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 12 | |
Material | Plastics and rubber | |
Weight | 108 g | g |
Dimensions | 120.5 x 58.5 x 15.7 mm | mm |
Price | 137.70€ ($149.99) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL U2: OUKITEL C25 - Compare OUKITEL Mix 2 - Compare OUKITEL C31 3/16GB - Compare |
OUKITEL K16 vs OUKITEL U2: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL K16’s camera vs OUKITEL U2’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | OUKITEL K16 | OUKITEL U2 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No |
OUKITEL K16 vs OUKITEL U2: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL K16 vs OUKITEL U2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | OUKITEL K16 | OUKITEL U2 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 3050 mAh | 2050 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 4-5 days | |
Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | |
Talk time | 25 hours | |
Fast charging | No | |
Wireless charging | No |
OUKITEL K16 vs OUKITEL U2: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL K16 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 202399 score points which is 100.00% faster than the OUKITEL U2, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL K16 vs OUKITEL U2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL K16 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 327 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL U2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1438 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL K16 and OUKITEL U2? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL K16 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 960x540.
- More battery capacity: 3050mAh vs 2050mAh (a difference of 1000mAh).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL K16 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL U2 (advantages)
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL U2 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
OUKITEL K16 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL K16 vs OUKITEL K7 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL K16 vs OUKITEL WP20
- Compare OUKITEL K16 vs OUKITEL C16 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL K16 vs OUKITEL K9
- Compare OUKITEL C35 vs OUKITEL K16
OUKITEL U2 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 7A vs Asus Zenfone Live L1
- Compare Vernee V3 vs Vernee V2 Pro
- Compare Letv Max vs Letv Max
- Compare Oppo A95 vs Oppo A94
- Compare Oppo A53 vs Oppo A53s