Compare Samsung Galaxy S10e vs IIIF150 R2022
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S10e | IIIF150 R2022 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 390544 | 313177 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 9820 | MediaTek Helio G95 |
| Diagonal size | 5.8 " | 6.78 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 2460x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Samsung SAK2L4 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 3100 mAh | 8300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 11 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 150 g | 350 g |
| Dimensions | 142,2 x 69,9 x 7,9 mm | 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm |
| Price | 367.87€ ($399.99) See Details | 186.88€ ($203.20) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy S10e vs IIIF150 R2022: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy S10e’s camera vs IIIF150 R2022’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Samsung SAK2L4 sensor and the 64Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S10e | IIIF150 R2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung SAK2L4 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Four LEDs |
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy S10e vs IIIF150 R2022: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy S10e vs IIIF150 R2022, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S10e | IIIF150 R2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3100 mAh | 8300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy S10e vs IIIF150 R2022: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S10e in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 390544 score points which is 24.70% faster than the IIIF150 R2022, which got 313177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy S10e vs IIIF150 R2022: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S10e in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 558 points score in "Single-core" of against the IIIF150 R2022 which got 427, it is 30.68% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2468 vs 1550 (59.23% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy S10e and IIIF150 R2022? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy S10e (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 24.70% faster in the Antutu test (77367 score difference).
- Best weight: 200 grams less (150 vs 350).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy S10e (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 12Mp Samsung SAK2L4
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 10Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 3100mAh (a difference of 5200mAh).
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy S10e related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S10e vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy S10e
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Samsung Galaxy S10e
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A71 vs Samsung Galaxy S10e
- Compare Blackview BV9700 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S10e
IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons
- Compare F150 R2022 vs OUKITEL WP17
- Compare F150 R2022 vs Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Compare F150 R2022 vs F150 H2022
- Compare F150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT
- Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 Air1 Pro