Compare Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
| Name | Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 671218 | 276448 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Diagonal size | 6.56 " | 5.2 " |
| Resolution | 2376x1080 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | No |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | 197 g | 139 g |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 73.3 x 8.9 mm | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB: Vivo X90 12/512GB - Compare Vivo X70 Pro 8/128GB - Compare Vivo IQOO 11 Pro 16/512GB - Compare |
343.00€ ($371.31) See Details |
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO 5 Pro’s camera vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung GN1 sensor and the 22.6Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 22.6 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO 5 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 671218 score points which is 142.80% faster than the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact, which got 276448. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 924 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact which got 501, it is 84.43% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3351 vs 1986 (68.73% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB and Sharp Aquos R2 Compact? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 142.80% faster in the Antutu test (394770 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung GN1 compared to 22.6Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2376x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1500mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Best weight: 58 grams less (139 vs 197).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Vivo IQOO 5 Pro 12/256GB related comparisons
- Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 5 vs Vivo IQOO 5 Pro
- Compare Vivo X60 Pro Plus vs Vivo IQOO 5 Pro
- Compare Vivo IQOO 7 Pro vs Vivo IQOO 5 Pro
- Compare Vivo IQOO 5 Pro vs Vivo V17
- Compare Vivo IQOO 5 Pro vs Vivo Y7s
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact