Compare Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy A20
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Samsung Galaxy A20 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 148199 | 90211 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P70 | Samsung Exynos 7884B |
| Diagonal size | 5.7 " | 6.4 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 1560x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 364 g | 169 g |
| Dimensions | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm | 158,4 x 74,7 x 7,8 mm |
| Price | 265.75€ ($287.69) See Details | 82.50€ ($89.31) See Details |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy A20: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 3WT’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy A20’s camera, see the difference between the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Samsung Galaxy A20 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 21 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX230 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy A20: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy A20, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 3WT | Samsung Galaxy A20 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 10300 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy A20: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 148199 score points which is 64.28% faster than the Samsung Galaxy A20, which got 90211. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 3WT vs Samsung Galaxy A20: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 3WT in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 320 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy A20 which got 242, it is 32.23% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1475 vs 742 (98.79% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 3WT and Samsung Galaxy A20? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3WT (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 64.28% faster in the Antutu test (57988 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 21Mp Sony IMX230 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1560x720.
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 6300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3WT (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A20 (advantages)
- Best weight: 195 grams less (169 vs 364).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A20 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Ulefone Armor 3WT related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
Samsung Galaxy A20 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A13 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A20
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 9 vs Samsung Galaxy A20
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Global vs Samsung Galaxy A20
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A14 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A20
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A02s vs Samsung Galaxy A20