Compare Ulefone Armor 9E vs Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 223811 | 31000 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | MediaTek MT6737 |
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | Sony IMX219 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 320 g | 155 g |
| Dimensions | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm | 155.8 x 77.8 x 9.35 mm |
| Price | 336.44€ ($366.46) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb: Ulefone Armor 9 - Compare Ulefone Note 12 - Compare Ulefone Armor 6S - Compare |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 9E’s camera vs Ulefone Tiger’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 8Mp Sony IMX219 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | Sony IMX219 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 9E vs Ulefone Tiger, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9E | Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 7-8 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9E in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 223811 score points which is 621.97% faster than the Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb, which got 31000. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 9E vs Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9E in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 417 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1531 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 9E and Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 9E (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 621.97% faster in the Antutu test (192811 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 8Mp Sony IMX219
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp Samsung S5K5E2.
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 4200mAh (a difference of 2400mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 9E (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 165 grams less (155 vs 320).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Ulefone Armor 9E related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Blackview BV9800 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 9 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6S vs Ulefone Armor 9E
Ulefone Tiger 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Tiger vs OUKITEL U20 Plus
- Compare Ulefone Tiger vs Doogee X5 Max Pro
- Compare HomTom HT20 vs Ulefone Tiger
- Compare Ulefone Tiger vs UMIDIGI Z1 Pro
- Compare Ulefone Tiger vs Vernee Thor