Compare Samsung Galaxy F62 vs Ulefone Armor X9
Name | Samsung Galaxy F62 | Ulefone Armor X9 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 441275 | 93188 |
CPU | Samsung Exynos 9825 | MediaTek Helio A25 |
Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 5.5 " |
Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1440x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 128 GB | 32 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | Yes |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 11 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastics and rubber |
Weight | 218 g | 235 g |
Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm | 158 x 77.5 x 13.85 mm |
Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy F62: Samsung Galaxy A20 - Compare Samsung Galaxy A54 5G 8/256GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy S21+ 8/128GB - Compare |
91.18€ ($98.60) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs Ulefone Armor X9: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy F62’s camera vs Ulefone Armor X9’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Samsung Galaxy F62 | Ulefone Armor X9 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs Ulefone Armor X9: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy F62 vs Ulefone Armor X9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Samsung Galaxy F62 | Ulefone Armor X9 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs Ulefone Armor X9: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy F62 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 441275 score points which is 373.53% faster than the Ulefone Armor X9, which got 93188. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs Ulefone Armor X9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy F62 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 768 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor X9 which got 138, it is 456.52% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2387 vs 846 (182.15% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy F62 and Ulefone Armor X9? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy F62 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 373.53% faster in the Antutu test (348087 score difference).
- Best weight: 17 grams less (218 vs 235).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 5Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1440x720.
- More battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy F62 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor X9 (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor X9 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy F62 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Samsung Galaxy F62
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy F62
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M31S vs Samsung Galaxy F62
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy F62
- Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy F62
Ulefone Armor X9 related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Armor X5 vs Ulefone Armor X9
- Compare Blackview BV5500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor X9
- Compare Blackview BV5500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor X9
- Compare Ulefone Armor X7 vs Ulefone Armor X9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7E vs Ulefone Armor X9