Compare Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A22 5G | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 258744 | 38695 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 700 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.6 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Metal |
| Weight | 203 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 167.2 x 76.4 x 9 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G: Samsung Galaxy M53 5G 6/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A01 Core - Compare Samsung Galaxy A33 5G 6/128GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A22 5G | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A22 5G | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 258744 score points which is 568.68% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 586 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 405.17% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1786 vs 603 (196.19% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 568.68% faster in the Antutu test (220049 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 54 grams less (149 vs 203).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 20mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A12 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A21s
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A51
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus