Compare Samsung Galaxy A30S 3/32Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A30S 3/32Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 117622 | 38695 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 7904 | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.4 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 1560x720 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 3 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 25 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Metal |
| Weight | 166 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 158,5 x 74,7 x 7,8 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price | 226.31€ ($244.99) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Samsung Galaxy A30S 3/32Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A30S’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 25Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A30S 3/32Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 25 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A30S 3/32Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A30S vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A30S 3/32Gb | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Samsung Galaxy A30S 3/32Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A30S 3/32Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 117622 score points which is 203.97% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A30S 3/32Gb vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A30S 3/32Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 271 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 133.62% faster. In "Multi-core" score 968 vs 603 (60.53% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A30S 3/32Gb and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A30S 3/32Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 203.97% faster in the Antutu test (78927 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 25Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1560x720 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A30S 3/32Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 17 grams less (149 vs 166).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1020mAh).
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy A30S 3/32Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 8 vs Samsung Galaxy A30S
- Compare Huawei Honor 10 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A30S
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 vs Samsung Galaxy A30S
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T vs Samsung Galaxy A30S
- Compare Huawei Honor 9X Global vs Samsung Galaxy A30S
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus