Compare Samsung Galaxy A82 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A82 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 322152 | 38695 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | MediaTek MT6753 |
| Diagonal size | 6.88 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal |
| Weight | g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A82: Samsung Galaxy A01 - Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 8/256GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A54 5G 8/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Samsung Galaxy A82 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A82’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A82 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A82 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A82 vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A82 | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Samsung Galaxy A82 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A82 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 322152 score points which is 732.54% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A82 vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A82 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 613 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 428.45% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1908 vs 603 (216.42% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A82 and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A82 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 732.54% faster in the Antutu test (283457 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 8Mp
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A82 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4500mAh (a difference of 520mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy A82 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A72 vs Samsung Galaxy A82
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A82
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A82 vs Samsung Galaxy A71
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A72 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A82
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Samsung Galaxy A82
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus