Compare Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb
Name | Samsung Galaxy A90 5G | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 432666 | 38695 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | MediaTek MT6753 |
Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
Battery | 4500 mAh | 5020 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 5 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 7.0 |
Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Metal |
Weight | 206 g | 149 g |
Dimensions | 164,8 x 76,4 x 8,4 mm | 144 x 70,1 x 8,6 mm |
Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G: Samsung Galaxy A34 5G 8/256GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A34 5G 8/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A04 4/64GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: |
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G’s camera vs Vernee Thor E’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Samsung GM1 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Samsung Galaxy A90 5G | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Vernee Thor E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Samsung Galaxy A90 5G | Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4500 mAh | 5020 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No |
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 432666 score points which is 1018.14% faster than the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb, which got 38695. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 736 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 534.48% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2584 vs 603 (328.52% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1018.14% faster in the Antutu test (393971 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM1 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 57 grams less (149 vs 206).
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4500mAh (a difference of 520mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs LG V50 ThinQ 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A90 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A72 5G
Vernee Thor E 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Blackview BV8000 Pro
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Vernee Thor E vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus