Compare LG K22+ vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

LG K22+ vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of LG K22+ with Vernee Thor 3/16Gb.
Name	LG K22+	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

Antutu benchmark	53477	37524
CPU	Qualcomm Snapdragon 215	MediaTek MT6753
Diagonal size	6.2 "	5 "
Resolution	1520x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	3 Gb	3 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	64 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Dual Camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	3000 mAh	2800 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)	Android 6.0
Material	Plastic	Metal and plastic
Weight	170 g	140 g
Dimensions	157,7 x 75,4 x 8,4 mm	142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm
Price	115.46€ ($124.99) See Details	Discontinued. View all Vernee models here Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:

LG K22+ vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the LG K22+’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	LG K22+	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

LG K22+ vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the LG K22+ vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	LG K22+	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Battery	3000 mAh	2800 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	1,5-2 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	6-7 hours	5-6 hours
Talk time	25 hours	20 hours
Fast charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging	No

LG K22+ vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

LG K22+ in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 53477 score points which is 42.51% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

LG K22+

6.2 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 215 / 3Gb / 64GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh

115.46€

$124.99

53477

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh

0.00€

$0.00

37524

LG K22+ vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

LG K22+ in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 105 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is -9.48% faster. In "Multi-core" score 378 vs 604 (-37.42% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

LG K22+

6.2 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 215 / 3Gb / 64GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh

115.46€

$124.99

105 / 378

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh

0.00€

$0.00

116 / 604

What is the difference between LG K22+ and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the LG K22+ (advantages)

Good performance: Is 42.51% faster in the Antutu test (15953 score difference).
Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 1280x720.
More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 200mAh).

Why it is better not to take LG K22+ (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

Best weight: 30 grams less (140 vs 170).

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have fast charging supports.
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

LG K22+ related comparisons

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons