Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 20 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
Name | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 515155 | 37524 |
CPU | Samsung Exynos 990 | MediaTek MT6753 |
Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
Rear camera | 12 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
Sensor model | Sony IMX555 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 4300 mAh | 2800 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 6.0 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Metal and plastic |
Weight | 194 g | 140 g |
Dimensions | 161,6 x 75.2 x 8,3 mm | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm |
Price | 518.62€ ($561.43) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy Note 20’s camera vs Vernee Thor’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Sony IMX555 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 12 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | Sony IMX555 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 vs Vernee Thor, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4300 mAh | 2800 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No |
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 515155 score points which is 1272.87% faster than the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb, which got 37524. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 vs Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 911 points score in "Single-core" of against the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb which got 116, it is 685.34% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3128 vs 604 (417.88% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy Note 20 and Vernee Thor 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1272.87% faster in the Antutu test (477631 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 4300mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 1500mAh).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy Note 20 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 54 grams less (140 vs 194).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 12Mp Sony IMX555
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 20 vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 20 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 20 vs Samsung Galaxy S21
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 20 vs Samsung Galaxy A52s
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro