Compare Xiaomi Mi CC10 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
| Name | Xiaomi Mi CC10 | Ulefone Armor 9E |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 317339 | 223811 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | MediaTek Helio P90 |
| Diagonal size | 6.57 " | 6.3 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | Samsung GW1 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4160 mAh | 6600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | g | 320 g |
| Dimensions | mm | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Mi CC10: Xiaomi 13 8/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Mi Note 10 - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 4/128Gb - Compare |
338.52€ ($366.46) See Details |
Xiaomi Mi CC10 vs Ulefone Armor 9E: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Mi CC10’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 9E’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Mi CC10 | Ulefone Armor 9E |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | Samsung GW1 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Mi CC10 vs Ulefone Armor 9E: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Mi CC10 vs Ulefone Armor 9E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Mi CC10 | Ulefone Armor 9E |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4160 mAh | 6600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Xiaomi Mi CC10 vs Ulefone Armor 9E: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Mi CC10 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 317339 score points which is 41.79% faster than the Ulefone Armor 9E, which got 223811. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Mi CC10 vs Ulefone Armor 9E: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Mi CC10 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 646 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 9E which got 417, it is 54.92% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2529 vs 1531 (65.19% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Mi CC10 and Ulefone Armor 9E? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Mi CC10 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 41.79% faster in the Antutu test (93528 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp Sony IMX471 vs 8Mp .
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Mi CC10 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 9E (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 48Mp Sony IMX586
- More battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 4160mAh (a difference of 2440mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 9E (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi Mi CC10 related comparisons
- Compare Vivo IQOO Pro vs Xiaomi Mi CC10
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi CC10
- Compare OnePlus 7T vs Xiaomi Mi CC10
- Compare Xiaomi Mi CC10 vs Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A vs Xiaomi Mi CC10
Ulefone Armor 9E related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Blackview BV9800 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 9 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6S vs Ulefone Armor 9E