Compare Nokia 1.3 vs AGM M2
Name | Nokia 1.3 | AGM M2 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 35188 | |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 | UNISOC 6531D |
Diagonal size | 5.71 " | 2.4 " |
Resolution | 1520x720 | 320x240 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | |
RAM | 1 Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | No | |
ROM | 16 GB | GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 1.3 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 3000 mAh | 1950 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 4 G | 2 G |
WiFi | Yes | No |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
Notifications Led | No | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | |
Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
Weight | 155 g | 138 g |
Dimensions | 147.3 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm | 139 x 56,8 x 16 mm |
Price | 79.95€ ($87.08) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all AGM models here
Alternatives to the AGM M2: AGM A9 4/32Gb - Compare AGM Glory G1S - Compare AGM M7 - Compare |
Nokia 1.3 vs AGM M2: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Nokia 1.3’s camera vs AGM M2’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 1.3Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Nokia 1.3 | AGM M2 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 1.3 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | No |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Flash | No |
Nokia 1.3 vs AGM M2: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 1.3 vs AGM M2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Nokia 1.3 | AGM M2 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 3000 mAh | 1950 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 7-8 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | No | No |
Wireless charging | No |
Nokia 1.3 vs AGM M2: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Nokia 1.3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 35188 score points which is 100.00% faster than the AGM M2, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Nokia 1.3 vs AGM M2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Nokia 1.3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM M2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Nokia 1.3 and AGM M2? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 1.3 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 8Mp compared to 1.3Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 320x240.
- More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 1950mAh (a difference of 1050mAh).
Why it is better not to take Nokia 1.3 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)
- Best weight: 17 grams less (138 vs 155).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Nokia 1.3 related comparisons
- Compare Oppo Reno Ace 2 vs Nokia 1.3
- Compare Nokia 1.4 vs Nokia 1.3
- Compare Nokia C1 Plus vs Nokia 1.3
- Compare Nokia 1.3 vs OnePlus N1
- Compare Apple iPhone XS Max vs Nokia 1.3
AGM M2 related comparisons
- Compare Rover X9 vs AGM M2
- Compare Suppu X6000 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Diamond Z2 vs AGM M2
- Compare Uniwa V708 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Stone V3 Plus vs AGM M2