Compare Vivo Y9s vs AGM M5

Vivo Y9s vs AGM M5 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vivo Y9s with AGM M5.
Name	Vivo Y9s	AGM M5

Antutu benchmark	168843	30188
CPU	Qualcomm Snapdragon 665	Qualcomm Snapdragon 210
Diagonal size	6.38 "	2.8 "
Resolution	2340x1080	320x240
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	2
RAM	8 Gb	1 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	128 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	48 Mp	2 Mp
Camera	Four cameras	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	32 Mp	Mp
Battery	4500 mAh	2500 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	4 G	2 G
WiFi	Yes	No
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 9.0	Android 8.1
Material	Plastic frame and glass case	Plastics and rubber
Weight	187 g	173 g
Dimensions	159,3 x 75.2 x 8.7 mm	155 x 64 x 16.2 mm
Price	Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Vivo models here Alternatives to the Vivo Y9s: Vivo iQOO Z1 6/128GB - Compare Vivo S15 Pro 12/256GB - Compare Vivo X Fold 12/512GB - Compare	78.51€ ($85.52) See Details

Vivo Y9s vs AGM M5: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vivo Y9s’s camera vs AGM M5’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 2Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Vivo Y9s	AGM M5
Rear camera	48 Mp	2 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash	No
Front (selfie) camera	32 Mp	Mp
Flash	No

Vivo Y9s vs AGM M5: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo Y9s vs AGM M5, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Vivo Y9s	AGM M5
Battery	4500 mAh	2500 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	3-4 days	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours	7-8 hours
Talk time	30 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging	No	No

Vivo Y9s vs AGM M5: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vivo Y9s in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 168843 score points which is 459.31% faster than the AGM M5, which got 30188. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vivo Y9s

6.38 inches (2340x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 665 / 8Gb / 128GB / 48Mp / 4500mAh

On Sale Soon

168843

AGM M5

2.8 inches (320x240) Glass / Snapdragon 210 / 1Gb / 16GB / 2Mp / 2500mAh

78.51€

$85.52

30188

Vivo Y9s vs AGM M5: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vivo Y9s in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 317 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM M5 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1391 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vivo Y9s

6.38 inches (2340x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 665 / 8Gb / 128GB / 48Mp / 4500mAh

On Sale Soon

317 / 1391

AGM M5

2.8 inches (320x240) Glass / Snapdragon 210 / 1Gb / 16GB / 2Mp / 2500mAh

78.51€

$85.52

0 / 0

What is the difference between Vivo Y9s and AGM M5? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo Y9s (advantages)

Good performance: Is 459.31% faster in the Antutu test (138655 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 2Mp
Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 320x240.
More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Vivo Y9s (disadvantages)

Does not have water resistant supports.

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M5 (advantages)

Best weight: 14 grams less (173 vs 187).
Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take AGM M5 (disadvantages)

Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Vivo Y9s related comparisons

AGM M5 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons