Compare Cubot King Kong vs AMIGOO R900
Name | Cubot King Kong | AMIGOO R900 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 21244 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6580 | MediaTek MT6580 |
Diagonal size | 5 " | 5.5 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 960x540 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 2 Gb | 1 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 2 Mp |
Battery | 4400 mAh | 2000 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 3 G | 3 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | GPS, A-GPS |
Notifications Led | Yes | |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 7.0 | Android 5.1 |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |
Weight | 220 g | g |
Dimensions | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm | x x x x x x x x x x x x x mm |
Price | 98.43€ ($106.44) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all AMIGOO models here
Alternatives to the AMIGOO R900: |
Cubot King Kong vs AMIGOO R900: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong’s camera vs AMIGOO R900’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Cubot King Kong | AMIGOO R900 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 2 Mp |
Flash | No |
Cubot King Kong vs AMIGOO R900: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong vs AMIGOO R900, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Cubot King Kong | AMIGOO R900 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4400 mAh | 2000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | |
Talk time | 30 hours | |
Fast charging | No | |
Wireless charging |
Cubot King Kong vs AMIGOO R900: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 100.00% faster than the AMIGOO R900, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot King Kong vs AMIGOO R900: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 72 points score in "Single-core" of against the AMIGOO R900 which got 65, it is 10.77% faster. In "Multi-core" score 258 vs 222 (16.22% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot King Kong and AMIGOO R900? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 2Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 960x540.
- More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 2000mAh (a difference of 2400mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AMIGOO R900 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take AMIGOO R900 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Cubot King Kong related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Nomu S10 vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Blackview R6 vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Doogee S30
- Compare ZOJI Z7 vs Cubot King Kong