Compare AllCall Atom vs Cubot J9
Name | AllCall Atom | Cubot J9 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 30599 | 23177 |
CPU | MediaTek MT6737 | MediaTek MT6580 |
Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 6.21 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 1520x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 2 |
RAM | 2 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | Yes |
ROM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Dual Camera | Four cameras |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 2100 mAh | 4000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 4 G | 3 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | GPS, A-GPS |
Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 7.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |
Weight | 152 g | g |
Dimensions | 148 x 72,8 x 8,5 mm | mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all AllCall models here
Alternatives to the AllCall Atom: |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot J9: Cubot J5 - Compare Cubot P40 - Compare Cubot KingKong 5 - Compare |
AllCall Atom vs Cubot J9: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the AllCall Atom’s camera vs Cubot J9’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | AllCall Atom | Cubot J9 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
AllCall Atom vs Cubot J9: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AllCall Atom vs Cubot J9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | AllCall Atom | Cubot J9 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2100 mAh | 4000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 8-9 hours |
Talk time | 20 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | No | No |
Wireless charging | No |
AllCall Atom vs Cubot J9: Antutu benchmark comparison.
AllCall Atom in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 30599 score points which is 32.02% faster than the Cubot J9, which got 23177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
AllCall Atom vs Cubot J9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
AllCall Atom in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot J9 which got 65, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 222 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between AllCall Atom and Cubot J9? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AllCall Atom (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 32.02% faster in the Antutu test (7422 score difference).
Why it is better not to take AllCall Atom (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot J9 (advantages)
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2100mAh (a difference of 1900mAh).
Why it is better not to take Cubot J9 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
AllCall Atom related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL C5 Pro vs AllCall Atom
- Compare Leagoo KIICAA Mix vs AllCall Atom
- Compare Meizu M5C vs AllCall Atom
- Compare AllCall Atom vs Huawei Honor 8X
- Compare AllCall Atom vs China Mobile A3S
Cubot J9 related comparisons
- Compare Leagoo M11 vs Cubot J9
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 7 Global vs Cubot J9
- Compare OUKITEL C16 vs Cubot J9
- Compare Cubot J9 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare Cubot X19S vs Cubot J9