Compare AllCall Madrid vs AGM M2

AllCall Madrid vs AGM M2 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of AllCall Madrid with AGM M2.
Name	AllCall Madrid	AGM M2

Antutu benchmark	21557
CPU	MediaTek MT6580	UNISOC 6531D
Diagonal size	5.5 "	2.4 "
Resolution	1280x720	320x240
Multi-touch (number of touches)	2
RAM	1 Gb	Gb
Bezel-less	No
ROM	8 GB	GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	8 Mp	1.3 Mp
Camera	Dual Camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	2 Mp	Mp
Battery	2600 mAh	1950 mAh
Wireless charging
Network	3 G	2 G
WiFi	Yes	No
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	Yes	No
Fingerprint's scanner	No	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 7.0
Material	Plastic	Plastics and rubber
Weight	180 g	138 g
Dimensions	154.70 x 76.20 x 8.8 mm	139 x 56,8 x 16 mm
Price	Discontinued. View all AllCall models here Alternatives to the AllCall Madrid:	Discontinued. View all AGM models here Alternatives to the AGM M2: AGM Glory G1 - Compare AGM Glory G1S - Compare AGM M7 - Compare

AllCall Madrid vs AGM M2: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the AllCall Madrid’s camera vs AGM M2’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 1.3Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	AllCall Madrid	AGM M2
Rear camera	8 Mp	1.3 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash	No
Front (selfie) camera	2 Mp	Mp
Flash	No

AllCall Madrid vs AGM M2: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AllCall Madrid vs AGM M2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	AllCall Madrid	AGM M2
Battery	2600 mAh	1950 mAh
Type	Removable	Removable
Stand-by time	4-5 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	1,5-2 days	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	6-7 hours	7-8 hours
Talk time	25 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging

AllCall Madrid vs AGM M2: Antutu benchmark comparison.

AllCall Madrid in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21557 score points which is 100.00% faster than the AGM M2, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

AllCall Madrid

5.5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh

0.00€

$0.00

21557

AGM M2

2.4 inches (320x240) Glass / 6531D / 1.3Mp / 1950mAh

0.00€

$0.00

AllCall Madrid vs AGM M2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

AllCall Madrid in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 66 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM M2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 229 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

AllCall Madrid

5.5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh

0.00€

$0.00

66 / 229

AGM M2

2.4 inches (320x240) Glass / 6531D / 1.3Mp / 1950mAh

0.00€

$0.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between AllCall Madrid and AGM M2? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AllCall Madrid (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 8Mp compared to 1.3Mp
Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 320x240.
More battery capacity: 2600mAh vs 1950mAh (a difference of 650mAh).

Why it is better not to take AllCall Madrid (disadvantages)

Does not have water resistant supports.

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)

Best weight: 42 grams less (138 vs 180).
Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

AllCall Madrid related comparisons

AGM M2 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.57/5 of 63

Frequent comparisons