Compare Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Coolpad Conjr
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | Coolpad Conjr |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 37524 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6753 | MediaTek MT6735P |
Diagonal size | 5 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 3 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
Battery | 2800 mAh | 2500 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 6.0 | Android 6.0 |
Material | Metal and plastic | Metal |
Weight | 140 g | g |
Dimensions | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm | mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Coolpad models here
Alternatives to the Coolpad Conjr: Coolpad Cool 20 6/128GB - Compare Coolpad Cool 20 4/128GB - Compare |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Coolpad Conjr: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor’s camera vs Coolpad Conjr’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | Coolpad Conjr |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
Flash | No |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Coolpad Conjr: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor vs Coolpad Conjr, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | Coolpad Conjr |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2800 mAh | 2500 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | |
Talk time | 20 hours | |
Fast charging | Yes | |
Wireless charging |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Coolpad Conjr: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37524 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Coolpad Conjr, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Coolpad Conjr: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the Coolpad Conjr which got 113, it is 2.65% faster. In "Multi-core" score 604 vs 390 (54.87% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vernee Thor 3/16Gb and Coolpad Conjr? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 2800mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 300mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Coolpad Conjr (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
Why it is better not to take Coolpad Conjr (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro
Coolpad Conjr related comparisons
- Compare Meizu M5S vs Coolpad Conjr
- Compare Coolpad Conjr vs Vernee Thor E
- Compare Coolpad Cool 20 vs Coolpad Conjr