Compare Oppo A52 vs Cubot King Kong CS
Name | Oppo A52 | Cubot King Kong CS |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 150199 | 21244 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | MediaTek MT6580 |
Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 4 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
Rear camera | 12 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 5000 mAh | 4400 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 3 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
Notifications Led | No | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Plastic |
Weight | 195 g | 220 g |
Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.5 x 8.1 mm | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm |
Price | 164.68€ ($179.06) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong CS: Cubot X30 8/256Gb - Compare Cubot KingKong 5 - Compare Cubot King Kong Star - Compare |
Oppo A52 vs Cubot King Kong CS: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Oppo A52’s camera vs Cubot King Kong CS’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Oppo A52 | Cubot King Kong CS |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 12 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Oppo A52 vs Cubot King Kong CS: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo A52 vs Cubot King Kong CS, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Oppo A52 | Cubot King Kong CS |
---|---|---|
Battery | 5000 mAh | 4400 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | No | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Oppo A52 vs Cubot King Kong CS: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Oppo A52 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 150199 score points which is 607.02% faster than the Cubot King Kong CS, which got 21244. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Oppo A52 vs Cubot King Kong CS: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Oppo A52 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 313 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot King Kong CS which got 60, it is 421.67% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1390 vs 249 (458.23% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Oppo A52 and Cubot King Kong CS? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo A52 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 607.02% faster in the Antutu test (128955 score difference).
- Best weight: 25 grams less (195 vs 220).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 12Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4400mAh (a difference of 600mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Oppo A52 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong CS (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong CS (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
Oppo A52 related comparisons
- Compare Oppo A52 vs Oppo A72
- Compare Oppo A52 vs Oppo A54 4G
- Compare Oppo A54 5G vs Oppo A52
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 5G vs Oppo A52
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Oppo A52
Cubot King Kong CS related comparisons
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare HT F801C vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Ulefone Armor X6 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Zopo zp700 vs Cubot King Kong CS