Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb vs Cubot King Kong Mini
| Name | Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb | Cubot King Kong Mini |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 301188 | 56199 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 4 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1080x540 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 2000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 209 g | 157 g |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76 x 8.8 mm | 119 x 58 x 12.1 mm |
| Price | 182.00€ ($197.65) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong Mini: Cubot P40 - Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 3 - Compare Cubot Pocket 3 - Compare |
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb vs Cubot King Kong Mini: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3’s camera vs Cubot King Kong Mini’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb | Cubot King Kong Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb vs Cubot King Kong Mini: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 vs Cubot King Kong Mini, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb | Cubot King Kong Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 2000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb vs Cubot King Kong Mini: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 301188 score points which is 435.93% faster than the Cubot King Kong Mini, which got 56199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb vs Cubot King Kong Mini: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 580 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot King Kong Mini which got 161, it is 260.25% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1783 vs 538 (231.41% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb and Cubot King Kong Mini? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 435.93% faster in the Antutu test (244989 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 8Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1080x540.
- More battery capacity: 5160mAh vs 2000mAh (a difference of 3160mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong Mini (advantages)
- Best weight: 52 grams less (157 vs 209).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong Mini (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 6/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 vs Realme 8
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M5 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3
- Compare Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3 vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Cubot King Kong Mini related comparisons
- Compare Cubot King Kong Mini vs Ulefone Armor 5S
- Compare Cubot King Kong Mini vs Cubot King Kong Mini 2
- Compare Blackview BV9100 vs Cubot King Kong Mini
- Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro vs Cubot King Kong Mini
- Compare Cubot King Kong 3 vs Cubot King Kong Mini