Compare Doogee S95 vs Cubot King Kong CS
| Name | Doogee S95 | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 180991 | 21244 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5150 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 285 g | 220 g |
| Dimensions | 168 x 79,3 x 13,8 mm | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm |
| Price | 294.70€ ($319.03) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong CS: Cubot Note 8 - Compare Cubot Note 20 - Compare Cubot Pocket 3 - Compare |
Doogee S95 vs Cubot King Kong CS: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Doogee S95’s camera vs Cubot King Kong CS’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Doogee S95 | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Doogee S95 vs Cubot King Kong CS: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Doogee S95 vs Cubot King Kong CS, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Doogee S95 | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5150 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Doogee S95 vs Cubot King Kong CS: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Doogee S95 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 180991 score points which is 751.96% faster than the Cubot King Kong CS, which got 21244. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Doogee S95 vs Cubot King Kong CS: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Doogee S95 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 392 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot King Kong CS which got 60, it is 553.33% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1400 vs 249 (462.25% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Doogee S95 and Cubot King Kong CS? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Doogee S95 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 751.96% faster in the Antutu test (159747 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2160x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 5150mAh vs 4400mAh (a difference of 750mAh).
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Doogee S95 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong CS (advantages)
- Best weight: 65 grams less (220 vs 285).
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong CS (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Doogee S95 related comparisons
- Compare Doogee S95 Pro vs Doogee S95
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Doogee S95
- Compare Doogee S95 vs Ulefone Armor 7E
- Compare OUKITEL WP6 vs Doogee S95
- Compare Doogee S95 vs Samsung Galaxy A71
Cubot King Kong CS related comparisons
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare HT F801C vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Ulefone Armor X6 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Zopo zp700 vs Cubot King Kong CS