Compare OUKITEL C21 vs Doogee X90

OUKITEL C21 vs Doogee X90 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of OUKITEL C21 with Doogee X90.
Name	OUKITEL C21	Doogee X90

Antutu benchmark	143177	21055
CPU	MediaTek Helio P60	MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size	6.4 "	6.1 "
Resolution	2310x1080	1280x600
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	2
RAM	4 Gb	1 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	Yes
ROM	64 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera	16 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Four cameras	Dual Camera
Sensor model	Omnivison OV16880
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	20 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	4000 mAh	3400 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	4 G	3 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	No	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)	Android 9.0
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	170 g	g
Dimensions	157.3 x 75.5 x 8.7 mm	mm
Price	141.08€ ($153.40) See Details	64.93€ ($70.60) See Details

OUKITEL C21 vs Doogee X90: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL C21’s camera vs Doogee X90’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp Omnivison OV16880 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	OUKITEL C21	Doogee X90
Rear camera	16 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model	Omnivison OV16880
Flash	Dual LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	20 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

OUKITEL C21 vs Doogee X90: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL C21 vs Doogee X90, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	OUKITEL C21	Doogee X90
Battery	4000 mAh	3400 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	8-9 hours	6-7 hours
Talk time	30 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging	No	No

OUKITEL C21 vs Doogee X90: Antutu benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL C21 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 143177 score points which is 580.01% faster than the Doogee X90, which got 21055. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

OUKITEL C21

6.4 inches (2310x1080) Glass / Helio P60 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp Omnivison OV16880 / 4000mAh

141.08€

$153.40

143177

Doogee X90

6.1 inches (1280x600) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 3400mAh

64.93€

$70.60

21055

OUKITEL C21 vs Doogee X90: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

OUKITEL C21 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 293 points score in "Single-core" of against the Doogee X90 which got 65, it is 350.77% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1439 vs 222 (548.20% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

OUKITEL C21

6.4 inches (2310x1080) Glass / Helio P60 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp Omnivison OV16880 / 4000mAh

141.08€

$153.40

293 / 1439

Doogee X90

6.1 inches (1280x600) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 3400mAh

64.93€

$70.60

65 / 222

What is the difference between OUKITEL C21 and Doogee X90? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C21 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 580.01% faster in the Antutu test (122122 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp Omnivison OV16880 compared to 8Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 5Mp .
Has a higher screen resolution: 2310x1080 vs 1280x600.
More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 3400mAh (a difference of 600mAh).

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C21 (disadvantages)

Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Doogee X90 (advantages)

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Doogee X90 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

OUKITEL C21 related comparisons

Doogee X90 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 260

Frequent comparisons