Compare Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs InFocus M535

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs InFocus M535 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vernee Thor 3/16Gb with InFocus M535.
Name	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb	InFocus M535

Antutu benchmark	37524
CPU	MediaTek MT6753	MediaTek MT6735
Diagonal size	5 "	5.5 "
Resolution	1280x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	3 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Battery	2800 mAh	2600 mAh
Wireless charging
Network	4 G	3 G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 6.0	Android 5.1
Material	Metal and plastic
Weight	140 g	g
Dimensions	142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm	mm
Price	Discontinued. View all Vernee models here Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:	Notify me when it goes on sale. View all InFocus models here Alternatives to the InFocus M535:

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs InFocus M535: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor’s camera vs InFocus M535’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb	InFocus M535
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Flash	No

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs InFocus M535: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor vs InFocus M535, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Vernee Thor 3/16Gb	InFocus M535
Battery	2800 mAh	2600 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	5-6 hours
Talk time	20 hours
Fast charging	Yes
Wireless charging

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs InFocus M535: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37524 score points which is 100.00% faster than the InFocus M535, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh

0.00€

$0.00

37524

InFocus M535

5.5" (1280x720) / MT6735 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2600mAh

On Sale Soon

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs InFocus M535: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the InFocus M535 which got 113, it is 2.65% faster. In "Multi-core" score 604 vs 390 (54.87% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb

5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh

0.00€

$0.00

116 / 604

InFocus M535

5.5" (1280x720) / MT6735 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2600mAh

On Sale Soon

113 / 390

What is the difference between Vernee Thor 3/16Gb and InFocus M535? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

More battery capacity: 2800mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 200mAh).
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the InFocus M535 (advantages)

Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .

Why it is better not to take InFocus M535 (disadvantages)

Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

InFocus M535 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.61/5 of 425

Frequent comparisons