Compare Kenxinda V6 vs Phicomm X100W
Name | Kenxinda V6 | Phicomm X100W |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 16642 | |
CPU | UNISOC SC7731 | |
Diagonal size | 4.5 " | " |
Resolution | 800x480 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 2 | 5 |
RAM | 1 Gb | 1 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | |
Rear camera | 2 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 2 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 1700 mAh | 2000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 3 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
Notifications Led | No | |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 7.0 | |
Material | Plastic | |
Weight | 140 g | g |
Dimensions | 133 x 67,4 x 8,8 mm | mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Kenxinda models here
Alternatives to the Kenxinda V6: |
Discontinued.
View all Phicomm models here
Alternatives to the Phicomm X100W: |
Kenxinda V6 vs Phicomm X100W: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Kenxinda V6’s camera vs Phicomm X100W’s camera, see the difference between the 2Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Kenxinda V6 | Phicomm X100W |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 2 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 2 Mp | Mp |
Flash | No |
Kenxinda V6 vs Phicomm X100W: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Kenxinda V6 vs Phicomm X100W, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Kenxinda V6 | Phicomm X100W |
---|---|---|
Battery | 1700 mAh | 2000 mAh |
Type | Removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 4-5 days | |
Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 4-5 hours | |
Talk time | 20 hours | |
Fast charging | No | |
Wireless charging | No |
Kenxinda V6 vs Phicomm X100W: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Kenxinda V6 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 16642 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Phicomm X100W, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Kenxinda V6 vs Phicomm X100W: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Kenxinda V6 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Phicomm X100W which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Kenxinda V6 and Phicomm X100W? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Kenxinda V6 (advantages)
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Kenxinda V6 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Phicomm X100W (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 8Mp compared to 2Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 800x480.
- More battery capacity: 2000mAh vs 1700mAh (a difference of 300mAh).
Why it is better not to take Phicomm X100W (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Kenxinda V6 related comparisons
- Compare HomTom HT16 vs Kenxinda V6
- Compare Kenxinda V6 vs Vernee T3 Pro
- Compare Kenxinda V6 vs UMIDIGI A3S
- Compare Kenxinda V6 vs VKworld F1
- Compare Kenxinda V6 vs Apple iPhone 6s Ref
Phicomm X100W related comparisons
- Compare Doogee X7 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare Doogee X7 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 4A
- Compare Xiaomi Mi A1 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Meizu M6S
- Compare Xiaomi Mi Note 3 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 5