Compare LG K40 vs Cubot X9

LG K40 vs Cubot X9 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of LG K40 with Cubot X9.
Name	LG K40	Cubot X9

Antutu benchmark	75447	29637
CPU	MediaTek Helio P22	MediaTek MT6592M
Diagonal size	5.7 "	5 "
Resolution	1440x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	2 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	32 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	16 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model		Sony IMX135
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	3000 mAh	2200 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	3 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	Yes	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 8.1	Android 4.4
Material	Plastic	Metal frame and plastic case
Weight	144 g	124 g
Dimensions	153 x 71,9 x 8,3 mm	143.5 x 72.5 x 7.3 mm
Price	96.45€ ($104.87) See Details	63.46€ ($69.00) See Details

LG K40 vs Cubot X9: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the LG K40’s camera vs Cubot X9’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 13Mp Sony IMX135 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	LG K40	Cubot X9
Rear camera	16 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model		Sony IMX135
Flash	LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	LED flash	No

LG K40 vs Cubot X9: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the LG K40 vs Cubot X9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	LG K40	Cubot X9
Battery	3000 mAh	2200 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	4-5 days
Battery Life	1,5-2 days	1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode	6-7 hours	4-5 hours
Talk time	25 hours	20 hours
Fast charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging	No

LG K40 vs Cubot X9: Antutu benchmark comparison.

LG K40 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 75447 score points which is 154.57% faster than the Cubot X9, which got 29637. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

LG K40

5.7 inches (1440x720) Gorilla glass / Helio P22 / 2Gb / 32GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

96.45€

$104.87

75447

Cubot X9

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6592M / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 2200mAh

63.46€

$69.00

29637

LG K40 vs Cubot X9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

LG K40 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 163 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot X9 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 797 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

LG K40

5.7 inches (1440x720) Gorilla glass / Helio P22 / 2Gb / 32GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

96.45€

$104.87

163 / 797

Cubot X9

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6592M / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 2200mAh

63.46€

$69.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between LG K40 and Cubot X9? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the LG K40 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 154.57% faster in the Antutu test (45810 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 13Mp Sony IMX135
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 1440x720 vs 1280x720.
More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2200mAh (a difference of 800mAh).
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take LG K40 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X9 (advantages)

Best weight: 20 grams less (124 vs 144).

Why it is better not to take Cubot X9 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.
Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

LG K40 related comparisons

Cubot X9 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons