Compare Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs LG K20
Name | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb | LG K20 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 85188 | 34177 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 | MediaTek MT6739 |
Diagonal size | 5.71 " | 5.45 " |
Resolution | 1520x720 | 960x480 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
RAM | 2 Gb | 1 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 3000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Plastic |
Weight | 161 g | 147 g |
Dimensions | 149×71.3×8.4 mm | 147 x 71,5 x 8,2 mm |
Price | 84.47€ ($91.84) See Details | 95.98€ ($104.36) See Details |
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs LG K20: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Nokia 4.2’s camera vs LG K20’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb | LG K20 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs LG K20: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 4.2 vs LG K20, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb | LG K20 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 3000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 1,5-2 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 6-7 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs LG K20: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 85188 score points which is 149.26% faster than the LG K20, which got 34177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb vs LG K20: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 175 points score in "Single-core" of against the LG K20 which got 115, it is 52.17% faster. In "Multi-core" score 798 vs 389 (105.14% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb and LG K20? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 149.26% faster in the Antutu test (51011 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 960x480.
Why it is better not to take Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the LG K20 (advantages)
- Best weight: 14 grams less (147 vs 161).
Why it is better not to take LG K20 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Nokia 4.2 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Samsung Galaxy A01
- Compare MiGueR Note 10 vs Nokia 4.2
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs LG Q6
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Oppo A15
- Compare Nokia 4.2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
LG K20 related comparisons
- Compare LG K22 vs LG K20
- Compare LG K20 vs LG Q7
- Compare AGM A2 vs LG K20
- Compare Huawei P50 vs LG K20
- Compare LG K20 vs Vivo U20