Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb vs OUKITEL C13 Pro
Name | Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb | OUKITEL C13 Pro |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 583188 | 33428 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek MT6739 |
Diagonal size | 6.57 " | 6.18 " |
Resolution | 2408x1080 | 960x480 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 4500 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 5 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
Notifications Led | Yes | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
Weight | 198 g | 164 g |
Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.6 x 8.9 mm | 155.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb: Vivo IQOO 10 12/512GB - Compare Vivo iQOO Neo5 SE 8/256GB - Compare Vivo IQOO 7 12/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C13 Pro: OUKITEL C32 - Compare OUKITEL WP17 - Compare OUKITEL WP5000 - Compare |
Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb vs OUKITEL C13 Pro: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo IQOO Neo 3’s camera vs OUKITEL C13 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Samsung GM1 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb | OUKITEL C13 Pro |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb vs OUKITEL C13 Pro: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo IQOO Neo 3 vs OUKITEL C13 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb | OUKITEL C13 Pro |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4500 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 5-6 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb vs OUKITEL C13 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 583188 score points which is 1644.61% faster than the OUKITEL C13 Pro, which got 33428. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb vs OUKITEL C13 Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 924 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C13 Pro which got 150, it is 516.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3449 vs 370 (832.16% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb and OUKITEL C13 Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1644.61% faster in the Antutu test (549760 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Samsung GM1 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 960x480.
- More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 1500mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C13 Pro (advantages)
- Best weight: 34 grams less (164 vs 198).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C13 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Vivo IQOO Neo 3 8/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Huawei Honor X10 Max vs Vivo IQOO Neo 3
- Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 5 vs Vivo IQOO Neo 3
- Compare Vivo U1 vs Vivo IQOO Neo 3
- Compare Vivo IQOO Neo 3 vs Elephone P7
- Compare Vivo Apex 2019 vs Vivo IQOO Neo 3
OUKITEL C13 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Doogee Y8 vs OUKITEL C13 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C15 Pro vs OUKITEL C13 Pro
- Compare OUKITEL C12 Pro vs OUKITEL C13 Pro
- Compare UMIDIGI A3 Pro vs OUKITEL C13 Pro
- Compare Leagoo Power 2 Pro vs OUKITEL C13 Pro