Compare Nokia 2.3 vs OUKITEL C16

Nokia 2.3 vs OUKITEL C16 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Nokia 2.3 with OUKITEL C16.
Name	Nokia 2.3	OUKITEL C16

Antutu benchmark	69311	24945
CPU	MediaTek Helio A22	MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size	6.2 "	5.71 "
Resolution	1520x720	1520x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	2 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	32 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Dual Camera	Dual Camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	4000 mAh	2600 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	4 G	3 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)	Android 9.0
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	183 g	153 g
Dimensions	157.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm	146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm
Price	117.13€ ($127.36) See Details	Discontinued. View all OUKITEL models here Alternatives to the OUKITEL C16: OUKITEL C23 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP10 - Compare OUKITEL WP12 - Compare

Nokia 2.3 vs OUKITEL C16: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Nokia 2.3’s camera vs OUKITEL C16’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Nokia 2.3	OUKITEL C16
Rear camera	13 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

Nokia 2.3 vs OUKITEL C16: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 2.3 vs OUKITEL C16, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Nokia 2.3	OUKITEL C16
Battery	4000 mAh	2600 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode	8-9 hours	5-6 hours
Talk time	25 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging	No	No

Nokia 2.3 vs OUKITEL C16: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Nokia 2.3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 69311 score points which is 177.86% faster than the OUKITEL C16, which got 24945. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Nokia 2.3

6.2 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 2Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh

117.13€

$127.36

69311

OUKITEL C16

5.71 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh

0.00€

$0.00

24945

Nokia 2.3 vs OUKITEL C16: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Nokia 2.3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C16 which got 71, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 213 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Nokia 2.3

6.2 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 2Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh

117.13€

$127.36

0 / 0

OUKITEL C16

5.71 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh

0.00€

$0.00

71 / 213

What is the difference between Nokia 2.3 and OUKITEL C16? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 2.3 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 177.86% faster in the Antutu test (44366 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 1400mAh).

Why it is better not to take Nokia 2.3 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 (advantages)

Best weight: 30 grams less (153 vs 183).

Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Nokia 2.3 related comparisons

OUKITEL C16 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.62/5 of 8

Frequent comparisons